Mailing List Archive

Re: [LoGH] New to the List

Ben Schmidt (gorilla@nycap.rr.com)
Fri, 9 Mar 2001 16:54:50 -0500


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C0A8B9.A7E51C00
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Justin,
      Good luck on the stats - I was thinking about doing Palladium RPG =
stats on these ships (much the same way Kitsune on the web did with his =
Star Trek, Star Wars, and Babylon 5 ship/fighter conversions) but am =
obviously (VERY) hampered in two ways: #1 - I don't have the Databook or =
Alba guide, and #2 I CAN'T READ A WORD OF JAPANESE!!!!!!!! :( -so it =
would all be guesswork from the Alba model kits I have and the episodes =
themselves. But a request - do you (or anyone on this list) have the =
stats for Brunhild translated? My interest is twofold: I'm building the =
Alba 1/5000 kit and would like to add a stats page to my display base =
(dimensions, crew complement, weapons, etc.) and this would be THE ship =
to start translating into Palladium system stats if I can get info on =
it. I DEEPLY appreciate anyone's help on this matter!
                                                  Ben Schmidt
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Justin Ho=20
  To: logh@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU=20
  Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 4:14 PM
  Subject: Re: [LoGH] New to the List






  >From: devans@uneb.edu=20
  >Reply-To: logh@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU=20
  >To: logh@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU=20
  >Subject: Re: [LoGH] New to the List=20
  >Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 12:46:33 -0600=20
  >=20
  >=20
  >***=20
  >Are there any tech manuals or lists with ship data, either official =
or semi=20
  >(or even inspired)? I think this series would well lend itself to=20
  >wargaming.=20
  >***=20
  >=20
  >Greetings, Keith!=20
  >=20
  >This topic came up a few days/weeks ago, and thus far, no joy.=20
  >=20
  >I'm trying to come up with figs for table top playing, and probably a =
major=20
  >bash of the Full Thrust system, though one on the list thinks Games=20
  >Workshop's BFG is a better fit. Whatever I do come up with, it will =
be=20
  >somethingsortoflike, at best.=20
  >=20
  >The masses involved in most of the battles suggest something like =
Renegade=20
  >Legion's Leviathan, but I'm playing with the idea of several tables, =
each=20
  >representing a very small slice of the battle, with the victory =
conditions=20
  >tying them together.=20
  >=20
  >If you've any further thoughts, please send them to me, and maybe we =
can=20
  >work in the same direction. ;->=3D=20
  >=20
  >Apologies to those on the list who are less interested in the series =
from=20
  >this point of view.=20
  >=20
  >Happy hunting!=20
  >=20
  >The_Beast=20
  >=20
  >-Douglas J. Evans, curmudgeon=20
    I have access to the Databook and Alba model ship guide (though I =
can't read the non-kanji) and the LOGH VI computer game as well as the =
entire series.  The problem is there are certain inconsistencies that I =
am still trying to reconcile between these various sources (# of =
fighters carried, cannon number, cannon power, etc.). =20

    That said,  the shields seem to work more along the lines of Full =
Thrust and Leviathan than BFG (ie modifying number of shots getting =
through rather than soaking hits).  I like Leviathan but I'm not sure =
how well its bookkeeping would work out with very large number of ships =
so I haven't worked on a Leviathan conversion yet.  However the whole =
squadron, flight, and wing organization with its various benefits and =
tradeoffs is perhaps better than Full Thrust for representing the huge =
masses of LOGH fighters.

  So far I have done a very preliminary Full Thrust version of the FP =
destroyer and Imperial destroyer using Fleet Book design rules while I =
try to figure out a good way to represent the larger ships.  Problem is =
that the large ships (esp. the FP flagships) would have enormous =
firepower and all the carriers of both sides would pump out huge numbers =
of fighters so I'm not sure how it would scale or balance.  That said =
I'm thinking of incorporating ADFC as standard on all ships and allow =
for all larger weapon systems to target fighters (1 roll, hit on 6, if =
hit do damage equal to rating of system).  One additional problem is the =
lethality of the weapons.  All ships in LOGH seem to carry a very large =
and varied weapons complement but have the hull strength of eggs.        =
                        &nbs! p;                      =20

  Also how to distinguish the major characters if one intends to have =
them in a battle, without being too overpowering?  I can only think of a =
few ways, like modifying screen effectiveness, attack dice number, or =
possibility for extra thrust points. =20

  Justin=20





-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
  Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at =
http://www.hotmail.com.