RE: [LoGH] Non-member submission from [Wayne Yin ] (fwd)
Victor Xing (victhebrick@earthlink.net)
Sun, 27 May 2001 22:48:16 -0700
There are several instances of ECM usage in LOGH... in the battle of Astate,
the Imperials used Comm Jamming against the three incoming FPA battle
groups. Another instance happened during one of the Iserlohn offensive led
by Yang, which severed the comm link between the fortress command and the
mobile garrison fleet. I think there are some others during the last two
season of the series, but naming them would be spolierish. However we must
consider that in LOGH, most of the recon data gathering are obtained by
recon-crafts, since on radar metallic/radiation (gives out electro signals)
asteroid belt can be mistaken for a fleet. Also, in some instances commands
from the battle field commander are delivered via shuttles (try to scramble
that :D ) In the contrary of limited ECM usage, I think both the FPA and
the Imperial fleet are so used to them that they don't really rely on their
sensors as the sole source of data gathering anymore.
I think I read that from the novels.
Vic
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-logh@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[mailto:owner-logh@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU]On Behalf Of Hank Wong
Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2001 5:04 PM
To: logh@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Subject: [LoGH] Non-member submission from [Wayne Yin
] (fwd)
If responding to this message, please limit your comments to the
historical and LoGH aspects.
Thank you.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 11:18:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wayne Yin
Reply-To: why@alumni.utexas.net
Subject: Re: [LoGH] Pearl Harbor (off-topic about war movies)
To: logh@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
whoa, talk about off-topic!
but to at least try and draw a connection with LoGH... i don't think
that anyone was ever able to launch a pearl harbor like attack in the
LoGH series, were they? presumably because everyone has good sensors,
so you can't really sneak up on your opponents while they are sleeping,
but then even if you could sneak up to iserlohn for example... then
what?
i also don't remember seeing any evidence of jamming or electronic
warfare (recognizable) in the series. is that an oversight in the
writing? then again, the fleets on both sides are probably too big to
hide anyway!
now to get off-topic...
--- Sampo Haarlaa wrote:
> Hello.
>
> My intention was to gather a group of friends when it comes here,
> make some japanese banners (or some other suitable items) and go
> to a premiere and scream things like Tora! Tora! Tora! as a
> protest for hollywood filmmakers (for raping history), but since
> I will leave to japan for three weeks next saturday I won't be
> able to do it.
heh. there will be plenty of right-wing, ultra-nationalist fanatics at
movie theaters here in japan, too, planning to do just that!
but what i find kind of hard to believe is how many of these guys (the
younger ones) who believe that japan was actually WINNING the war right
up until the end, when the US played the atomic trump card! (in other
words, that america could not defeat japan fair and square, and sank to
resorting to nukes out of desperation.)
> Granted, I should not rate a movie until I have seen one, but
> since Bruckenhaimer/Bay combination has not produced anything
> even barely watchable, I believe their capabilities are not up
> to task of this story*
well, i won't get to see it for myself until it opens 7/14 in japan.
so no spoilers, please! i don't want to know how it ends! oh, wait, i
already know what happened at pearl harbor...
(actually, i already know from watching the movie trailers how
bruckheimer/bay plan to end the movie with an upbeat note, but i won't
spoil the ending for anyone here.)
> By the way, I could dig up a novel (I think it was called
> 'Vietnam', but I don't remember it author right now) about
> a hollywood screenwriter who writes a succesful Vietnam
> trilogy which shows that USA kicked butt, producer of course
> demanded it.
uhmn... technically the US *was* kicking butt in vietnam, since the US
army defeated the NVA every time they fought. (ia drang valley came
pretty close to a defeat for the US, though, but for the intervention
of massive airpower.) but wasn't vietnam the quintessential example of
winning the battle(s) and losing the war? i remember reading in
someone's memoirs how at the geneva talks, one US officer said to his
NVA counterpart, "you have never managed to defeat us in battle," to
which he replied, "true, but irrelevant."
