archive: Re: Manga vs. Anime [SPOILER]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0011_01BE5CD9.2271E220 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello all ! I’m happy to join in LoGH ML. SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT I hope that you will not be disgusted my bringing the past topics up. At Fri, 22 Jan 1999 23:33:08, Xerxes J. wrote: >The manga is a poor representation of the original work. Michihara Katsumi >does not understand the characters and why things happened. If you have >no access to the novel, refer to the anime when there is any doubt. I agree the opinion that the anime is more representative than the manga in general. But I think there is a great difference between the anime and the original only for that episode. In the anime, when Oberstein gave the information about the atrocious plan for nuclear boumb attack, Reinhardt refused Oberstein’s proposal (and Oberstein proceeded in secret under pretence of his mistake). But in the original novel, Reingardt refused the cruel proposal once, however, he ORDERD to let the attack pass at last. I can not understand why the staff made such radical change in the anime. The argument between Reinhardt and Kircheis does not mean anything if Reinhardt does not have any guilty conscience about that he leave the attack ON PURPOSE. And it is natural for Kircheis to get angry(but his expression in the manga is overemphasis). I rather suppose the manga represents the original as to that episode. It is true that Ms. Michihara sometimes changes or modifies the stories, but it does not mean that she does not understand the characters and why the things happened, I think. Thanks. Karirin (Kariya) ------=_NextPart_000_0011_01BE5CD9.2271E220 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello all ! I’m happy to = join in=20 LoGH ML.

SPOILER ALERT
SPOILER=20 ALERT

I hope that you will not be = disgusted my=20 bringing the past topics up.

At Fri, 22 Jan 1999 23:33:08, = Xerxes J.=20 wrote:

>The manga is a poor = representation of=20 the original work. Michihara Katsumi
>does not understand = the=20 characters and why things happened. If you have
>no access = to the=20 novel, refer to the anime when there is any doubt.

I agree the opinion that the = anime is more=20 representative than the manga
in general.
But I think there is a = great=20 difference between the anime and the original
only for that episode.=20

In the anime, when Oberstein = gave the=20 information about the atrocious
plan for nuclear boumb attack, = Reinhardt=20 refused Oberstein’s proposal
(and Oberstein proceeded in secret = under=20 pretence of his mistake). But
in the original novel, Reingardt = refused the=20 cruel proposal once, however,
he ORDERD to let the attack pass at = last. I can=20 not understand why
the staff made such radical change in the anime. = The=20 argument
between Reinhardt and Kircheis does not mean anything if=20 Reinhardt
does not have any guilty conscience about that he leave the = attack=20 ON
PURPOSE. And it is natural for Kircheis to get angry(but his=20 expression
in the manga is overemphasis).
I rather suppose the = manga=20 represents the original as to that episode.

It is true that Ms. Michihara = sometimes=20 changes or modifies the stories,
but it does not mean that she does = not=20 understand the characters and
why the things happened, I=20 think.

Thanks.

Karirin (Kariya)

------=_NextPart_000_0011_01BE5CD9.2271E220--