Mailing List Archive

[LoGH] So who's this "seekt" guy?

JC (jcollis@wam.umd.edu)
Wed, 18 Apr 2001 13:41:26 -0400 (EDT)


Glad you asked.

The following comes from my notes for History 225 at the University of
Maryland (Modern Military History after 1860) Lecture #21.

1920: Hans von Seekt
-Chief of staff of the German army from WWI until 1920
1920-1926: Head of the German Army during the Reichswehr
  -Emphasized maneuverability and mobility over firepower in warfare
  -Believed in the skill of personell being greater than machines
  -Spends more money on the army than any other great power at the time
  -Imposed a ruthless merit system for officers

Officers under Seekt:
 -1920: All officers must have gone to university
 -1 year of officer's cadet training was increased to a 3.5 year officer
school
 -Training in officer's school was thorough and technical
 -Officers were also encouraged to spend a year studying engineering and
economics in civilian universities
 -Officers were also sent to other countries to learn about new
developments.
 -Officers had high social status at this time (as did all soldiers)
 -They were also the highest paid officers in all of Europe

Seekt's army performed intensive formation training
 -great attention was paid to basic level training
 -perry and thrust became the standard basic maneuver
 -Seekt's general staff was made to think critically about warfare
  -400 people on his general staff did R&D and writing about war
  -Because of this they were able to build on what they did before and
during WWI
 -Devolution of control occured, and NCO's and lower officers were made to
be competent and take initiative.

Seekt's army tested new theories in full scale exercises
 -They were the only army in Europe at this time to do so.
 -The Germans learned that horses in cavalry when the rest of the army is
mechanized doesn't work.
 -Cavalry takes the initiative and mechanizes itself.

Seekt believes in mobile warfare.
 -Superiority of maneuverability (sp?) over firepower
 -War of movement

Empahsis on jointness
 -Air power was seen to be a multiplier of force rather than a threat.
  -Unlike the UK and France there was little interservice rivalry

1926: Seekt leaves the army.

Hope this helps explain something.

--jc