Re: Reuentahl's Death (Spoiler)
ctchaun@OntheNet.com.au
Tue, 4 Feb 1997 20:55:41 +1000 (EST)
Hello...
Could it really only be Reuentahl's own ambition that brought about his
downfall? I mean he has too much pride to go back and beg for forgiveness.
Besides, the death of Lutz ( sorry about the spelling ) doesn't leave him a
lot of rooms in the Empire. With almost everyone turned against him, I mean
the influential ones, it left him no choice. He said before he died that he
did not betray the Emperor.
Sushi
>Hello,
>
>It's really very harsh to say that Reuentahl was a traitor. Yet he is
>the one who carries much blame for the "rebellion". (Rubinsky, Ranke et
>al carry most.) I don't think his leading all his troops to fight
>Mittermeier's was an act "to keep the Kaiser's spirit up". Mittermeier
>did give him the last chance to stop his bizarre act before bloodshed
>occured. He should have taken it. It's Reuentahl's own ambition that
>brought about his downfall.
>
>Reinhard-Siegfried
>