BOUNCE logh@soda.csua.berkeley.edu: Non-member submission from [Jeff Jarlett <jpjarlet@unity.ncsu
Hank Wong (hankwong@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU)
Mon, 27 Apr 1998 14:22:06 -0700 (PDT)
Note to original poster and anybody else who's had this problem- you may
want to resubscribe as a less specific address so that majordomo won't
reject your address if you're logged into a different server than the one
you were on when you subscribed...
example, if you're subscribed as galewolf@beiowulf.odin.mil.ge, you might
want to change that to galewolf@odin.mil.ge (assuming both work, or
course). The easiest way to do this is to first un-subscrib, and then
specify the new address when re-subscribing.
-Hank
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 07:09:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: owner-logh@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
To: owner-logh@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Subject: BOUNCE logh@soda.csua.berkeley.edu: Non-member submission from [Jeff Jarlett <jpjarlet@unity.ncsu.edu>]
>From hankwong@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU Sun Apr 26 07:09:55 1998
Received: from eos00mh.eos.ncsu.edu (eos00mh.eos.ncsu.edu [152.1.9.14])
by soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.8/) via ESMTP id HAA10435
for <logh@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Sun, 26 Apr 1998 07:09:55 -0700 (PDT)
env-from (jpjarlet@unity.ncsu.edu)
Received: from sun34-g100ha.sicl.ncsu.edu (sun34-g100ha.sicl.ncsu.edu [152.1.164.37])
by eos00mh.eos.ncsu.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id KAA23016
for <logh@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Sun, 26 Apr 1998 10:09:53 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: jpjarlet@eos.ncsu.edu
Message-ID: <35434031.61BB@unity.ncsu.edu>
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 10:09:53 -0400
From: Jeff Jarlett <jpjarlet@unity.ncsu.edu>
Organization: Grand Duchy of Strauss
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; SunOS 5.5.1 sun4u)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: logh
Subject: Re: Question !!!!!!
References: <19980426065840.8565.qmail@hotmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Henrietta Wu wrote:
> Now, that leads to another question. Does Reinhard desperately need
> Oberstein? I've always have to impression that Reinhard is fine on his
> own. May be the author of logh lionized Reinhard's omnipotence. I guess
> their association is mutually beneficial to them both regardless of the
> side effects.
Well, I think Oberstein is necessary ,as the guy who does the things
necessary that you really do not want to do, and cannot do due to
morals. In fact, the Episode I just watched last night, was very
similar to a DS9 ep I watched last week
On a side note, I noticed that in ep.19 on the computer screen, there
are two bars that read
Hit Points and Mental Points respectively:
Also I found it amusing that during the battle with all the nobles, they
were playing the Theme to Dragon Half (one of Betthoven's Symphonies...)
> I was
> watching J.I. Jane the other day and I was absolutely horrified at the
> intense military training one has to go through in order to obtain
> operational skills. Like it or not, Reinhard is a rather dry and flat
> character. No human flesh. Never seen him mess around with interns like
> that particular someone at the White House. ( Do women come with power
> or do power comes with women? )
Maybe he doesn't care about chasing the ladies that much. Some people
are so consumed by ambition that they can let everything else fall by
the wayside.
As for him being rather dry and flat, I somehow find him delightly
intricate in terms of his thinking.