Message-ID: <361F1A8F.3108@hkusua.hku.hk> Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1998 01:27:59 -0700 From: Reinhard-Siegfried <h9407313@hkusua.hku.hk> X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win16; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: logh Subject: Re: Bucock's mistakes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, (This one is surely a SPOILER for those who haven't gone through Seasons 2 and 3. STOP HERE if you are one of them!) Battle of (Ratemario): The battle was not a strategical decision but a political one. As the Chief of Staff General Chan (?) said, this planet system is the last of the uninhabited. Either stop Reinhard here or the Free Planets will break up, as far as morale is concerned. Or perhaps let Reinhard occupy Heinessenpolis and force Trunhit to order both Bucock and Yang to surrender. Bucock was right to halt the senseless assault by the Free Planets Fleet at the beginning of the battle. Even if the centre of the Reichsfloette commanded by Mittermeyer were broken (I doubt if it could happen at all), either wing of the Reichsfloette was still big enough to hold the Free Planets Fleets so that the other wing would come up to surrond it. Reinhard would still have achieved his strategic objective by anihilating Bucock's fleets before Yang's possible arrival. Battle of (Mal-Arteda): As the morale of the Free Planets had already broken, Bucock should have fought to delay the advance of Kaiser Reinhard, maybe in a series of lesser-scale battles, and brought as much of his troops to Iserlohn and Yang. This is the ideal situation. (At least Yang et al would welcome it.) I think when Bucock was "face to face" against Kaiser Reinhard this time, he gambled for the impossible victory: killing the Kaiser, just what Yang almost succeeded in the Battle of Vermillion. Really the last Free Planets Fleet vs one battleship and one man. Not a bad gamble. Reinhard-Siegfried p.s.: I apologize for my long "absence" in this list.